10

Text Size:

-A A +A

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2017-08-15 17-1128 DCT THE HILSINGER COMPANY v. EYEEGO, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-15 16-2695 PATO IN RE: FRANCIS [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-15 17-1640 MSPB ZIEGLER v. MSPB [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-15 16-2598 PATO PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA v. HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-15 16-2254 DCT VISUAL MEMORY LLC v. NVIDIA CORPORATION [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-14 16-2488 MSPB DALE v. NAVY [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 16-2605 DCT CERTUSVIEW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. S & N LOCATING SERVICES, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 16-2561 PATO C-CATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ARRIS GROUP, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 17-1923 CAVC LARUE v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 17-1470 MSPB LICARI v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 17-1544 DCT PICCONE v. MATAL [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 17-1742 MSPB RAKOWSKY v. OPM [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-11 17-1621 MSPB ROSE v. DEFENSE [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-10 17-1687 MSPB BROWN v. DEFENSE [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-10 16-2661 MSPB RUMSEY v. DOJ [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-10 16-2179 DCT AMGEN INC. v. HOSPIRA, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-10 17-1908 MSPB JONES v. HHS [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-10 16-2647 DCT AIA AMERICA, INC. v. AVID RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-10 16-2094 DCT AIA AMERICA, INC. v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-10 16-1542 CFC AIRPORT ROAD ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. US [OPINION] Precedential

Pages