10

Text Size:

-A A +A

RSS Feed

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2017-08-29 17-1912 CFC HARRIS v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-28 16-1502 PATO RETURN MAIL, INC. v. USPS [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-28 16-1706 PATO ULTRATEC, INC. v. CAPTIONCALL, LLC [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-25 16-1811 PATO IN RE: STEPAN COMPANY [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-25 16-2673 PATO IN RE: CHUDIK [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-25 16-1047 DCT ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. v. OCTANE FITNESS, LLC [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-25 16-2560 DCT COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS, LLC v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-22 16-1356 DCT ALVARADO HOSPITAL, LLC v. COCHRAN [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-22 16-2321 PATO NIDEC MOTOR CORPORATION v. ZHONGSHAN BROAD OCEAN MOTOR CO [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-22 17-1735 CAVC VINCENT v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-22 16-1932 CAVC GAZELLE v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Precedential
2017-08-22 16-1356 DCT ALVARADO HOSPITAL, LLC v. COCHRAN [ERRATA] Precedential
2017-08-22 16-1932 CAVC GAZELLE v. SHULKIN [ERRATA] Precedential
2017-08-21 16-2256 PATO IN RE: WALTER [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2181 PATO IN RE: WILLIAM D. HOBER, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2249 DCT REMBRANDT GAMING TECHNOLOGIES v. BOYD GAMING CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2622 DCT GONZALEZ v. NEW LIFE VENTURES, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2296 CFC ADAMS v. US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2090 BCA HIGHLAND AL HUJAZ CO., LTD. v. SPEER [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-08-21 16-2369 DCT THOUGHT, INC. v. ORACLE CORPORATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential

Pages