10

Text Size:

-A A +A

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above. All dispositions are available in PACER. Opinions issued since 2012 are also available through the U.S. Government Publishing Office’s govinfo service.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2020-12-10 20-1256 DCT BLACKBERRY LIMITED v. FACEBOOK, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2020-12-10 20-1511 DCT EXPRESS MOBILE, INC. v. EGROVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2020-12-10 20-1469 PTO BOARD OF REGENTS OF UT v. BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-09 20-1314 MSPB HESLOP v. IRS [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-09 20-1483 DCT WPEM, LLC v. SOTI INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-09 20-1675 CAVC BRAY v. WILKIE [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-08 20-1384 PTO In Re FULTON [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-08 20-1968 CAVC VALENZUELA v. WILKIE [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-08 20-1321 DVA NOVA v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [OPINION] Precedential
2020-12-07 19-1882 MSPB HARRINGTON v. DVA [OPINION] Precedential
2020-12-07 20-1898 MSPB FLYNN v. DVA [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-12-07 19-2359 DCT SIONYX LLC v. HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K. [OPINION] Precedential
2020-12-04 19-2293 MSPB ESPARRAGUERA v. ARMY [OPINION] Precedential
2020-12-04 19-1567 PTO AUSTRALIAN THERAPEUTIC v. NAKED TM, LLC [ORDER] Precedential
2020-12-04 19-2395 CIT DILLINGER FRANCE S.A. v. US [ERRATA] Nonprecedential
2020-12-03 19-2395 CIT DILLINGER FRANCE S.A. v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2020-12-01 19-2078 CFC ALBRIGHT v. US [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-11-30 20-1347 PTO In Re TSAI [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2020-11-30 19-2381 CIT STAR PIPE PRODUCTS v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2020-11-25 20-1105 PTO CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC [OPINION] Nonprecedential

Pages