10

Text Size:

-A A +A

RSS Feed

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2017-09-21 17-129 DCT IN RE: CRAY INC. Precedential
2017-09-20 16-1808 PATO NFC TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. MATAL [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-20 16-1809 PATO NFC TECHNOLOGY, LLC v. MATAL [RULE 36 JUDGMENT][1] Nonprecedential
2017-09-18 16-2735 PATO IN RE: NOMULA [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-09-18 16-2604 DCT FRONT ROW TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-09-18 16-2142 CAVC GOODMAN v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-18 17-1212 DCT RADWARE, LTD. v. F5 NETWORKS, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-09-15 17-1005 DCT QUALITY EDGE, INC. v. ROLLEX CORPORATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-09-15 16-2677 DCT FIRST DATA CORPORATION v. INSELBERG [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-15 16-2721 PATO IDEMITSU KOSAN CO., LTD. v. SFC CO. LTD. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-14 17-1043 PATO MIMEDX GROUP, INC. v. MUSCULOSKELETAL TRANSPLANT [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2017-09-13 17-2235 DCT WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-13 17-2130 DCT WAYMO LLC v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-13 16-2641 DCT ALLIED MINERAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. OSMI, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-13 16-1795 DCT INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-12 16-2196 CFC LUMMI TRIBE v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2017-09-12 17-1810 MSPB REID v. OPM [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-09-12 16-1823 PATO CABLZ, INC. v. CHUMS, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-09-12 17-2008 CAVC SHILL v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2017-09-11 17-1740 MSPB DAVIS v. ARMY [OPINION] Nonprecedential

Pages